|
From Reijo Yli-Karjanmaa, FinlandSent to NIST, July 13, 2005
The phrase "Global collapse then ensued" occurs frequently in the reports of Project 6. But it is a mere proposition with no kind of supportive momentum calculations to back it, the real question being: how did the collapse on one floor (which I don't say is impossible) turn into a progressive collapse that destroyed the whole buildings -- despite the fact that the towers were mostly in the normal temperature and the structures were sound? It must be shown that such a total collapse was indeed possible in such an immensely short time without external energy. Not even the word 'momentum' is mentioned except in an annexe to one of the supporting technical reports (and even there only a one-floor drop is examined). There is no kind of examination of how the potential energy of the buildings could have possibly been sufficient for all the phenomena seen. The report does not even so much as mention, let alone explain, the features that are alien to a gravitation-driven collapse, such as the almost complete pulverization of concrete and other non-metallic substances and the extremely hot spots in the rubble. Reijo Yli-Karjanmaa Finland |