Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
At the core of the September 11, 2001 attack
is a series of stupendous lies, including:
Adding to the absurdity of the official story are facts such as:
How could such glaring red flags be ignored by the vast majority
of Americans, and indeed most people throughout the world?
To grasp how this is possible it is helpful to understand the history
and sophistication of the "weapons of mass deception"
that are used regularly to achieve the aims that the powerful
could not attain through legitimate means.
There are many examples of intentional deceptions that,
unlike the Big Lie of 9/11/01, are widely recognized,
such as the specter of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction
concocted by the administrations of George W. Bush and Tony Blair
as a pretext to invade Iraq.
Other less contemporary examples are described on this site under
Historical Precedents for 9/11/01.
With each operation, the perpetrators gain more experience
about how the news media and the public will react --
experience useful in the planning of subsequent operations.
For example, despite reports in local news outlets
that responders to the
Oklahoma City bombing
discovered unexploded bombs inside the building,
national media reports remained free of any mention of such
contradictions to the official story.
It is likely that the success of the cover-up of this operation
emboldened the planners of the 9/11/01 attack.
The September 11, 2001 attack was not only bolder than previous attacks,
it also likely involved the most careful planning of any
psychological operation ever undertaken.
We can see in its design and cover-up multiple layers of deception:
should the outermost layer be exposed as fraudulent,
the deeper layers will serve to continue to obscure the truth.
Broadly speaking, there are three layers of cover-up:
The mainstream official story:
This is the story as told by the mainstream media
since the day of the attack.
The "limited hangouts":
These are revelations that seem shocking to
adherents to the official story, but fall far short of the whole truth.
Examples are the many warnings of the attack that the administration
should have acted on.
The "poison pills":
These are extreme ideas that have either no basis in evidence
or only an illusory one
and serve to discredit evidence-based research
about the core facts of the attack through guilt-by-association.
Examples are the
by propaganda such as In Plane Site, and
racist ideas like "the Jews did it."
Remarkably, it appears that the vast majority of propaganda
supporting all three layers of deception was produced,
not by attack insiders,
but by people exploited by the perpetrators using psychological engineering.
The perpetrators are apparently highly expert at designing memes
that effectively recruit people to unwittingly support such
diversions from the true nature of the attack.
page last modified: 2007-12-08