9-11 Review
articles critiques
9-11 Research
reviews essays
9-11 Review
sections
Attack & Cover-Up
Means & Motive
Info Warfare
contents
Info Warfare
Trojan horses
dissembling websites
hoax-promoting videos
dissembling books
legal subterfuge
parade of errors
phantom planes
Webfairy's Whatzit
pod-planes
North Tower hit
South Tower hit
bumble planes
Flight 93
fake calls
Pentagon attack
757 maneuvers
eyewitnesses
no debris
crash debris
small impact hole
missing wings
turbofans 101
standing columns
punchout
obstacles
small plane
Boeing 737
Flyover
WTC demolition
seismic spikes
pre-impact explosions
collapse times
diminishing fires
Building 6 explosion
basement bombs
spire to dust
WTC 2 powerdown
mini nukes
pull it
vast conspiracy
divide and conquer
left gatekeepers
Holocaust denial
the Big Tent
intimidation
propaganda
hit parade
conspiracy theory
Denmark
shell game

Media and Propaganda

The mainstream media has played a central role in promoting and maintaining the 9/11 Myth. Following the attack, the large media outlets dutifully described the events of that day within the confines of the official story, avoiding facts, questions, and entire topics that point to official complicity.

Rather than asking difficult questions, the corporate media has been quick to attack and dismiss serious challenges to the official story.

Language as Propaganda

Language plays a crucial role, not only in attacking these challenges through the use of pejorative labels such as conspiracy theories, but through the shaping of the way people perceive the central events of the attack itself -- such as the total destruction of the Twin Towers. Those events were labeled collapses by the media -- language adopted even by most researchers proposing that explosives brought down the Towers. Yet the definition of "collapse" clashes with the explosive reality of those events documented by the numerous photographs, videos, and eyewitness accounts.

e x c e r p t
title: The Semantics of Deception
authors: C. Thurston

According to Merriam-Webster, "collapse" means "to cave or fall in or give way <the bridge collapsed>". The leading hypothesis coming from bona fide scientific analysis is that the Towers DIDN'T cave in or give way, they were systematically and progressively EXPLODED from the top down, starting from the impact zone in each Tower.

If one compares the meaning of the words "collapse" and "explosion" outside of the confusing context of the destruction of the Towers, it becomes clear that they are, in fact, opposites. A collapse "pulls things down", whereas an explosion "blows things up". A true collapse, by its nature, once triggered, is a self-fulfilling event that needs only the help of gravity to reach its completion.

The description of the Towers' destruction as "collapses" was cemented within hours and days of the attack.

s u m m a r y
title: Helpful Hints for Understanding What Happened on 9/11
Helpful Hints for Understanding What Happened on 9/11: Perception, Suggestion and Reality in the Destruction of the World Trade Center
N. J. Burkett, an ABC News correspondent, was standing more than a block away from the WTC Towers on 9/11 when the South Tower destruction begins. He interrupts his live TV commentary by shouting as everyone runs for cover: "...A HUGE EXPLOSION NOW - RAINING DEBRIS ON ALL OF US! WE"D BETTER GET OUT OF THE WAY!" This was typical of the early reporting, but by the afternoon all of the major media had removed the word "explosion" from their dictionaries. From this point on, the Towers had "collapsed". This shift in language and its repetition by a parade of media "experts" contributed to the widespread perception, not of what people had seen, but of what they were TOLD they had seen.

The belief that the airplanes caused the destruction of the Towers was central to the success of 9/11 as a false flag attack. 9/11 can be seen within the context of the long and continuing history of false flag provocations and the wars of aggression that inevitably follow in their wake. Entire populations are dragged along through pain and suffering as the confused and unwitting victims of this ancient and terrible practice.

Operation Mockingbird

A historical example of the shaping of media messages to achieve covert aims is Operation Mockingbird, a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operation to influence domestic and foreign media. In this operation the CIA recruited journalists for the dual purpose of gathering information and disseminating propaganda. Wikipedia gives this overview of the operation's history:

e x c e r p t
title: Operation Mockingbird
In 1948, Frank Wisner was appointed director of the Office of Special Projects (OSP). Soon afterwards OSP was renamed the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC). This became the espionage and counter-intelligence branch of the Central Intelligence Agency. Wisner was told to create an organization that concentrated on "propaganda, economic warfare; preventive direct action, including sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition and evacuation measures; subversion against hostile states, including assistance to underground resistance groups, and support of indigenous anti-Communist elements ini threatened countries of the free world." 1  

Later that year Wisner established Mockingbird, a program to influence the domestic and foreign media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry. According to Deborah Davis ("Katharine the Great"): "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles." 2  

...

In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News'), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). 3   According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work. 4  

References

1.
Invisible Government, 1964
2. Katharine the Great, 1979
3. CIA and the Media, Rolling Stone Magazine, 10/20/1977
4. A Very Private Woman, 1998

page last modified: 2010-12-18
Copyright 2004 - 2011,911Review.com / revision 1.08 site last modified: 12/21/2012