In the last year, the science research into 9/11 has allowed us to
make stronger conclusions that were possible a year ago: not that they
"Let It Happen On Purpose" (LIHOP) but that it was an "Inside Job".
In viewing the events from the latter perspective, we find that more
of the evidence fits in, and there are fewer unproductive "red herrings"
So it took 911Review.org a year to figure out that the demolition
of Building 7 was an inside job?
(And it seems they are still not clear about the Twin Towers' demolition.)
It's nice that
is able to make stronger conclusions than it was a year ago.
Many people grasped the truth from the moment of the attack,
particularly those who had seen building demolitions
or had studied the Oklahoma City bombing.
Peter Meyer articulated a persuasive case
that the towers were demolished in an
posted two days after the attack.
Some of the key elements that support the stronger point of view include:
- The visas obtained by many of the hijackers through the
US Consulate in Jeddah as described in the SpringmanInterview,
especially the visa of Hani Hanjour.
What's the number one point that the 9/11/01 attack was an inside job?
Air Force stand-down?
Buildings turning to dust?
No, it's some point about how alleged hijackers got some some visas
from some foreign consolate.
I still haven't gotten around to reading SpringmanInterview.
- The prior training of some the HijackersPatsies at US military
- The fact that the TwinTowers exploded rather than collapsed.
is careful not to disturb the conflation of impact and collapse,
ignoring the 56 and 102 minutes that elapsed between those events
in the South and North Towers, respectively.
Exploded reinforces that conflation
since people associate explosions with the impact fireballs,
and remember their destruction only as collapses.
- The synchronized demolition demonstrated in the Building7Collapse.
- The fact that the PentagonAttackDebris shows that what hit
the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757, therefore not Flight77.
- The PentagonAttackDamage that could have only been caused by a warhead.
Here we go again -- overreaching proclamations of fact.
possibly know all weapons in existence
and their properties to know that only a "warhead"
could cause the observed damage?
The 20 m. long 1 m. diameter cylinder under the fuselage of the
plane that hit the South Tower, which makes it unlikely to have been
Flight 175, even if it was a Boeing 767 - see Sept11Videos.
A streak of reflection registering about one pixel wide
becomes a precisely measured cylinder --
and it gets better: the cylinder launches a missile.
These imaginative interpretations of some pictures
regarding the plane collisions
are given the same weight by
as the demolition of the towers.
- The fact that the anthrax in the AnthraxAttacks was from the
US Army illegal bio-weapons programme, and that it's targets in
the Capitol were senators who opposed the Patriot Act, and caused such
a disruption to the democratic process that the Patriot Act was passed
without it even being read.
- The OngoingCoverup led by the President [sic] and Vice-President [sic].
- The lack of any substantial evidence that the HijackersPatsies were
even on the planes - there has been security video footage from the
airport at Portland, but none of any of them boarding the planes
at Logan, Newark or Dulles. Hanjour is reported by McMedia as not
even having a ticket!
- The lack of any meaningful inquiry into the plane crashes as required
by law, which would be of no consequence if they LIHOP, but would
reveal the overwhelming evidence that it was an Inside Job. This includes
failure to release most of the black box data, and the truncating
of the only voice data that they did allow to be heard - see
An Inside Job means that 9/11 was planned and executed by elements of the
US government and shadow government, and that the likely role of
OsamaBinAsset was as an intelligence asset, and that the hijackers
that actually existed were likely patsies.
The distinction is important in that there is a media disinformation
campaign pushing the "The Saudis Did It" flavour of LIHOP, as well as
some "9/11 skeptics" who are advocating the LIHOP as a means of preventing
or dissuading investigation into the fact that it was an Inside Job.
Not all people in the LIHOP camp are attempting to
There are many reasons people reject MIHOP
("Made It Happen on Purpose"),
such as subconscious unwillingness to abandon powerful myths
like the fire-induced crumbling of the Twin Towers.
Because of the much higher level of planning and larger number of insiders
required by MIHOP,
its acceptance requires confronting
a more shocking level of depravity by our leaders.
Most such victims of the 9/11/01 psychological operation are sincere,
smears them as obstructing investigation.
does not mention propaganda campaigns aimed at the skeptics,
an example of which is this very site,
which buries the core MIHOP ideas
the remote control takeover of the jetliners,
the prevention of intercepts,
and the demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7
in a morass of discrediting ideas such
pod-planes attacking the Twin Towers,
a Depleted Uranium warhead hitting the Pentagon,
a Mach 10 UFO overflying the Towers.
Or try one of these actions:
of this page
(last modified 2003-12-30 20:54:46)