InsideJob - 9/11Review

InsideJob

In the last year, the science research into 9/11 has allowed us to make stronger conclusions that were possible a year ago: not that they "Let It Happen On Purpose" (LIHOP) but that it was an "Inside Job". In viewing the events from the latter perspective, we find that more of the evidence fits in, and there are fewer unproductive "red herrings" to follow.

So it took 911Review.org a year to figure out that the demolition of Building 7 was an inside job? (And it seems they are still not clear about the Twin Towers' demolition.) It's nice that 911Review.org is able to make stronger conclusions than it was a year ago. Many people grasped the truth from the moment of the attack, particularly those who had seen building demolitions or had studied the Oklahoma City bombing. Peter Meyer articulated a persuasive case that the towers were demolished in an article posted two days after the attack.

Some of the key elements that support the stronger point of view include:

The visas obtained by many of the hijackers through the US Consulate in Jeddah as described in the SpringmanInterview, especially the visa of Hani Hanjour.

What's the number one point that the 9/11/01 attack was an inside job? Air Force stand-down? Buildings turning to dust? No, it's some point about how alleged hijackers got some some visas from some foreign consolate. Bribery maybe? I still haven't gotten around to reading SpringmanInterview. Yawn.

The prior training of some the HijackersPatsies at US military facilities.
The fact that the TwinTowers exploded rather than collapsed.

911Review.org is careful not to disturb the conflation of impact and collapse, ignoring the 56 and 102 minutes that elapsed between those events in the South and North Towers, respectively. Exploded reinforces that conflation since people associate explosions with the impact fireballs, and remember their destruction only as collapses.

The synchronized demolition demonstrated in the Building7Collapse.
The fact that the PentagonAttackDebris shows that what hit the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757, therefore not Flight77.
The PentagonAttackDamage that could have only been caused by a warhead.

Here we go again -- overreaching proclamations of fact. How could 911Review.org possibly know all weapons in existence and their properties to know that only a "warhead" could cause the observed damage?

The 20 m. long 1 m. diameter cylinder under the fuselage of the plane that hit the South Tower, which makes it unlikely to have been Flight 175, even if it was a Boeing 767 - see Sept11Videos.

A streak of reflection registering about one pixel wide becomes a precisely measured cylinder -- and it gets better: the cylinder launches a missile. These imaginative interpretations of some pictures regarding the plane collisions are given the same weight by 911Review.org as the demolition of the towers.

The fact that the anthrax in the AnthraxAttacks was from the US Army illegal bio-weapons programme, and that it's targets in the Capitol were senators who opposed the Patriot Act, and caused such a disruption to the democratic process that the Patriot Act was passed without it even being read.
The OngoingCoverup led by the President [sic] and Vice-President [sic].
The lack of any substantial evidence that the HijackersPatsies were even on the planes - there has been security video footage from the airport at Portland, but none of any of them boarding the planes at Logan, Newark or Dulles. Hanjour is reported by McMedia as not even having a ticket!
The lack of any meaningful inquiry into the plane crashes as required by law, which would be of no consequence if they LIHOP, but would reveal the overwhelming evidence that it was an Inside Job. This includes failure to release most of the black box data, and the truncating of the only voice data that they did allow to be heard - see Flight77BlackBoxes.

An Inside Job means that 9/11 was planned and executed by elements of the US government and shadow government, and that the likely role of OsamaBinAsset was as an intelligence asset, and that the hijackers that actually existed were likely patsies.

The distinction is important in that there is a media disinformation campaign pushing the "The Saudis Did It" flavour of LIHOP, as well as some "9/11 skeptics" who are advocating the LIHOP as a means of preventing or dissuading investigation into the fact that it was an Inside Job.

Not all people in the LIHOP camp are attempting to dissuade investigation. There are many reasons people reject MIHOP ("Made It Happen on Purpose"), such as subconscious unwillingness to abandon powerful myths like the fire-induced crumbling of the Twin Towers. Because of the much higher level of planning and larger number of insiders required by MIHOP, its acceptance requires confronting a more shocking level of depravity by our leaders.
Most such victims of the 9/11/01 psychological operation are sincere, but 911Review.org smears them as obstructing investigation.

911Review.org does not mention propaganda campaigns aimed at the skeptics, an example of which is this very site, which buries the core MIHOP ideas such as the remote control takeover of the jetliners, the prevention of intercepts, and the demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 in a morass of discrediting ideas such as pod-planes attacking the Twin Towers, a Depleted Uranium warhead hitting the Pentagon, and a Mach 10 UFO overflying the Towers.

French.
Or try one of these actions: LocalSiteMap, of this page (last modified 2003-12-30 20:54:46)